Geller's Analysis of the Juan Williams NPR Affair

Juan-Williams
Juan Williams Fired From NPR

I AM GRATEFUL FOR THIS HIGH-PROFILE INCIDENT. Much like with the Ground Zero mosque affair, Americans have suddenly become aware of something quite terrible—a sea change, a paradigm shift, a profound transformation of a basic assumption, and a stunning reversal of their very basic unalienable rights. Their sensibilities are shaken. How could such a major seismic shift be kept hidden, kept so secret, until suddenly Juan Williams, a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, gets fired for telling the truth? Is it any wonder that recent polls show that the majority of Americans no longer trust the media? That is a good thing.

To Williams’ point, we have an entire government agency, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), dedicated to protecting us from terrorists who are largely Muslim. We have torturous security procedures at every stage of air travel. We bear unfathomable costs in taxpayer dollars, but worse, in the surrender of privacy and individual rights because of Islamic jihad: because of the 9/11 Muslim terrorists; and the British Muslims who planned to blow up seven planes and kill 4,000 Americans and/or British people in the name of Islam in 2006; and because of Richard Reid, the Muslim with the exploding shoes; and the Christmas day bomber, the Muslim with the exploding crotch.

And yet in watching the mainstream media coverage of Juan Williams affair, we witness the fact that the media still cannot face up to its own capitulation. It’s all over the airwaves, but no one will discuss what is actually happening—the loss of the freedom of speech to Islamic supremacism and domination. This is a deadly fight—Islam in the West and its suppression of free speech.

When the horror of jihad is discussed, it is always in the context of a “fringe” element among Muslims committing violent jihad. The “extremists” are slaughtering people every day across the world in the name of Islam. But aren’t those who are destroying our constitutional republic, shutting us down, attacking free speech and demonizing the good and the truth tellers the real extremists and radicals? Isn’t CAIR, as well as the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim Students Association, the Muslim American Society, the Islamic Circle of North America, and the North American Islamic Trust, the real extremists? The only difference between them and the military wing of Islam is their weapon of choice. Islamic supremacist groups in Western countries viciously attack our unalienable rights and chip away at our very legal and societal foundations.

CAIR et al slaughter human thought. They are destroyers, as ruinous and destructive as the organizations of their fellow Muslims: Al Qaeda, Hezb’Allah, Hamas, Al-Muhajiroun, MILF, Islamic jihad, Fatah, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen, Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, the Armed Islamic Group, Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin, Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, and all the rest of them.

This is war. And fighting that war has been Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN), the Muslim Brotherhood’s man in Congress, who called Juan Williams, a black American, a “bigot” and “un-American.” Considering the notorious Islamic history of Muslims keeping blacks as slaves (abid) —to this very day in North Africa—it is the height of black humor (no pun intended) that this Islamic supremacist would call an honorable African American a “bigot.” Ellison is twisting the very definition of “American” to some perverted idea of sharia. This is rich coming from a man who took money from a group that is the American wing of an organization whose stated aim is “eliminating and destroying Western Civilization from within.”

Read it all.

[Pamela Geller's Analysis of the Juan Williams NPR Affair]

Sheikh Anwar Al-Awlaki's 44 Ways To Support Jihad

al-alaki
Sheikh Anwar Al-awlaki

WILL OUR WESTERN LEADERSHIP ever renounce this dhimmitude, this hunger and thirst after Saudi money, this allegiance not to America, but to our money lords in China and the Middle East? This man Al-awlaki, born as an American, was once hosted at the Pentagon as the voice of Islamic moderation, but now we see that the American leadership was sucker punched yet again.

The "apparent" moderates, this silent majority tucked away into our neighborhoods like ticking time bombs will never renounce jihad. They will bide their time, living off the largesse of its host country until the numbers game begins to increase in their camp even more favorably. Only then do they begin their direct violent assault on the kafir, the infidel, the unbeliever. History is clear. This is how the Muslims have interpreted and implemented their war book since the very times of their founder, that grizzled war lord and sex-crazed imposter named Mohammed. Nothing has changed. Nothing will change. Why should it? They, with their Leftist allies, are winning this war of attrition against the naive and disinterested. They have snookered the West, and with the billions of oil dollars circulating in their mosques and mouthpieces, the infamous Islamic ego has been unleashed upon the civilized world once again, and it is written in their very own death manual, the Qu'ran, that blood will run in the streets and rivers before, they, with Allahu Akbar searing their throats and melting their eye sockets are resolutely stopped in their tracks again...

So we've gotten our hands on a circulating publication by America's Most Wanted Terrorist, an American-born, American-raised malefactor now hiding somewhere in Yemen it is speculated, but is currently under warrant for to stand trial treason or perish by officially-sanctioned assassination if he can't be captured.

Everyone should download this manual, and learn that most, nearly all perhaps, so-called Muslim moderates do not exist; they are merely gestating jihad in one form of another. And again, this approach is straight from the mouths of active terrorists themselves, duly commanded by their tactless Qu'ran, and implemented against every culture this band of tribal lords have ever invaded along the course of its 1400-year history, spreading its darkness across Africa and Asia, and now again the West.

(Editor's Note: Site and Video have been removed) But beforewarned, it is clear that this is an authentic terrorist recruiting website, and here's how I know that. Reading their front and center disclamer, one finds:

“The views presented in this article/video do not reflect the views of the RevolutionMuslim.com (RM); rather this article/video is posted only for educational and informational purposes. The blogger and RevolutionMuslim is not affiliated with any terrorist states or organisations and condemns all forms of terrorism carried out in the name of freedom and democracy.” (italics mine.)

Not only does that RM site host all the latest “inside” information, the disclaimer contains the often glaring tell-tale sign the anti-jihad resistance has learned to detect as we parse their statements:

“…and condemns all forms of terrorism carried out in the name of freedom and democracy.”

This is classic taqiyya, tricky wordplay, a snake-charmer’s charade meant to console and fool the kafir just as the loudest and most loquacious spokesmen of al-Qaeda et al remind us, we are quite certain that Muslim terrorists do not carry out their butchery “in the name of freedom and democracy.” So tread lightly. Don't be snared. Don't be scared. Just be warned.

China Is Not Our Friend

china-finance
The Chinese Dragon

PITY THE CHINESE. The inhabitants of the world's next superpower cannot search the internet or assemble or travel or speak or read or write or even reproduce without restriction. Yet in the lands where freedom is abundant, China, rather than earning well-deserved rebukes, continues to be championed as the ineluctable future. This disgraceful journey began with a liberal assumption: the west, it was claimed, is more likely to influence China by partnering with it, by giving it a prominent position inside, rather than pushing it outside, global institutions.

But in the decades since, far from moulding the Chinese state's behaviour, it is the west that has incrementally given up on its own values in order to appease Beijing. It has been customary since the early 1990s for American presidents to invite the Dalai Lama to Washington. Last year Barack Obama did away even with this minor gesture of solidarity with the Tibetans for fear of offending Beijing. Even the brief private audience Obama eventually granted the beleaguered Tibetan leader was accompanied by humiliation: the Dalai Lama was made to exit the White House through the back doors.

Contrary to the claims made by western apologists, China is not a substantially freer country today than it was a decade ago. The tools that have empowered the Chinese people—the internet, for instancehave strengthened the state in equal, perhaps even greater, measure: an ordinary Chinese citizen's ability today to communicate instantly with the outside world is matched by the state's capacity to silence him equally rapidly. Freedoms mean nothing if they are not accompanied by corresponding restrictions on the state's power to check them on a whim. Liu Xiaobo may be celebrated as a hero in the west, but in China he does not even have recourse to an appeal.

Read it all.

Author Kapil Komireddi is an Indian freelance writer; he writes principally about foreign affairs, particularly Indian foreign policy, and his work has appeared in American, Indian and British publications.

Pulverizing the American Promise Into 2 camps

WITH ARTICLES LIKE THIS COMING OUT of Time magazine, it is inevitable that in the immediate future, the United States will be split into two partisan camps. However, this will not be the traditional schism of republicans vs. democrats, contrary to Mr. Barney Frank’s attempt to start ideological partisan warfare.

The real split will be of naive, easily-manipulated, small-time mom and pop investors, who only care about looking at their daily Yahoo finance screens and 401(k) statements, seeing more black than red, and only focusing on what happened in the immediate past, and the forward looking taxpayers, who see the upcoming budget deficit fiasco, the social security ponzi scheme, the Medicare/Medicaid debacle, the ridiculous underfunding in public and corporate pension funds, the rising city and state taxes, the shuttering factories, the rising unemployment, the plummeting American production base, the “seasonally” upward-adjusted economic data coupled with consistently downward revised prior economic releases, the increasing savings rate and the multi trillion discrepancy in consumer purchasing power.

The taxpayers are becoming angrier and angrier at the net present value destruction of future opportunities of being a U.S. citizen, while investors cheer every piece of information (whether or not supported by facts) that provides a push to their current net worth, ignorant of what this may mean for the future.

There will come a point where this schism reaches a boiling point, in the meantime, the paradox is that so many of the taxpayers are also investors, who are caught in a tug of war with themselves on what the proper response to the crisis should be: happy as a result of bear market rallies, or sad when they put the facts into perspective.

Thune Claims "Obama Experiment Has Failed'

IN A SEARING CRITICISM, South Dakota Sen. John Thune likened the Obama administration to a science project gone wrong as he used the Republicans' weekly radio address to urge voters to back a new kind of change this November.

"The Obama experiment has failed," Thune said in the address.

With both parties shaping their closing arguments just ahead of the midterm elections, Thune charged that the health care changes and financial regulations and stimulus spending, all backed by Washington Democrats have not turned the economy around.

"One of the Democrats' main responsibilities over the past two years was to improve the economy. Instead, they decided to try an experiment to grow government, raise taxes, and take over health care," he said. Thune said the approach ended up "openly hostile" toward business, contributing to the weak economic recovery.

"The Democrats have controlled the White House and both chambers of Congress for nearly two years, and have proven that more government is not the answer," he said, calling for a "new direction."

Read it all.

SAF Sues Eric Holder, FBI

ACTING ON BEHALF OF A GEORGIA resident and honorably discharged Vietnam War veteran, the Second Amendment Foundation today filed a lawsuit against Attorney General Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Investigation over enforcement of a federal statute that can deny gun rights to someone with a simple misdemeanor conviction on his record.

The lawsuit was filed in United States District Court for the District of Columbia. SAF and co-plaintiff Jefferson Wayne Schrader of Cleveland, GA are represented by attorney Alan Gura, who successfully argued both the Heller and McDonald cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.

In July 1968, Schrader, then 21, was found guilty of misdemeanor assault and battery relating to a fight involving a man who had previously assaulted him in Annapolis, MD. The altercation was observed by a police officer, who arrested Schrader, then an enlisted man in the Navy, stationed in Annapolis. The man he fought with was in a street gang that had attacked him for entering their "territory," according to the complaint.

Schrader was ordered to pay a $100 fine and $9 court cost. He subsequently served a tour of duty in Vietnam and was eventually honorably discharged. However, in 2008 and again in 2009, Mr. Schrader was denied the opportunity to receive a shotgun as a gift, or to purchase a handgun for personal protection. He was advised by the FBI to dispose of or surrender any firearms he might have or face criminal prosecution.

"Schrader's dilemma," explained SAF Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb, "is that until recently, Maryland law did not set forth a maximum sentence for the crime of misdemeanor assault. Because of that, he is now being treated like a felon and his gun rights have been denied.

"No fair-minded person can tolerate gun control laws being applied this way," he added. "Mr. Schrader's case is a great example of why gun owners cannot trust governmentbureaucrats to enforce gun laws."

Now, more than ever, we need your commitment to fight the war against unlawful gun enforcement. The lawyer's bills are mounting. Fighting for freedom is not inexpensive. Help us raise the amount we need to stop the anti-gunners dead in their tracks.

Support from patriots like you will help us make sure what happened to Jefferson Wayne Schrader doesn't happen to you.

The Second Amendment Foundation is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

For our projects to be successful, we must count on the voluntary financial support from individuals like you who care. We need your financial support today to ensure we have the resources to beat back anti-gunners who will
stop at nothing to take away our right and ability to defend ourselves and our families.

Systemic Islam

ISLAM IS NOT PRECISELY A RELIGION nor is it precisely a cult. It is a complete system, a slick, stealth (until it isn't anymore), top to bottom, criminal enterprise controlled by totalitarian thugs using totalitarian methodologies. Greater Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a gray beard for all the other components. Islamization occurs when there are sufficient numbers of Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called religious rights.

When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to the "reasonable" Muslim demands for their religious rights, they also get the other components under the table. Here's how it works in all places and in all eras (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007).

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone.

In fact, they may be featured in articles and films and stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

    United States—Muslim 1.0%
    Australia—Muslim 1.5%
    Canada—Muslim 1.9%
    China—Muslim 1%-2%
    Italy—Muslim 1.5%
    Norway—Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

    Denmark—Muslim 2%
    Germany—Muslim 3.7%
    United Kingdom—Muslim 2.7%
    Spain—Muslim 4%
    Thailand—Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal food (clean by Islamic standards), thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves—along with threats for failure to comply (United States).

    France—Muslim 8%
    Philippines—Muslim 5%
    Sweden—Muslim 5%
    Switzerland—Muslim 4.3%
    The Netherlands—Muslim 5.5%
    Trinidad & Tobago—Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris, car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Mohammed cartoons).

    Guyana—Muslim 10%
    India—Muslim 13.4%
    Israel—Muslim 16%
    Kenya—Muslim 10%
    Russia—Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burnings:

    Ethiopia—Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

    Bosnia—Muslim 40%
    Chad—Muslim 53.1%
    Lebanon— Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

    Albania—Muslim 70%
    Malaysia—Muslim 60.4%
    Qatar—Muslim 77.5%
    Sudan—Muslim 70%

After 80% expect state-initiated ethnic cleansing and genocide:

    Bangladesh—Muslim 83%
    Egypt—Muslim 90%
    Gaza—Muslim 98.7%
    Indonesia—Muslim 86.1%
    Iran—Muslim 98%
    Iraq—Muslim 97%
    Jordan—Muslim 92%
    Morocco— Muslim 98.7%
    Pakistan—Muslim 97%
    Syria—Muslim 90%
    Tajikistan—Muslim 90%
    Turkey—Muslim 99.8%
    United Arab Emirates—Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' or the Islamic House of Peace; there's supposed to finally be peace because everybody now is a Muslim:

    Afghanistan—Muslim 100%
    Saudi Arabi—Muslim 100%
    Somalia—Muslim 100%
    Yemen—Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that's not the case. Muslims continue killing each other for a variety of upmanship reasons.

'Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidels. - Leon Uris, 'The Haj'

It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large, creating no-go zones for non-Muslims including the police, and other emergency forces such as firefighters and medical workers.

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.