Roving Muslim Gangs Terrorize Europe

In Great Britain where the euphemism for Muslims causing trouble is enlarged in declaring them Asian (since many of the British Muslims are of Pakistani roots), here's more astounding behavioral malfeasance by young Mohammedan thugs who like to play hard and they play for keeps. Thanks Fred for the clip:

Every Gang An Aggressor
Every Gang An Aggressor, We Told You We Didn't Like Your Kind Around Here

There is a serious problem in the North of England with a quarter of our disadvantaged so-called Asian population (apologies to the Chinese and Indians) ripping off motor insurance. I could fill pages of cases but essentially a car load of Asians target a lone white person and at an opportune moment cause an “accident”. The victim is then confronted by four men saying it is their fault and screaming at them for their stupidity. If four is not enough mobiles are then used to summon up even more “cousins”.

A relative who was hit on a supermarket carpark found herself surrounded by first four and then about 12 men, which for a slightly built school teacher of 60 was quite unpleasant. The only people to offer help were a group of English students one of whom quietly approached her and said they would wait and watch until she was able to leave. With that number of “witnesses” she had no hope and it cost her £3000 which was not a bad hours work for the Asians.

These roving youth gangs are moving in cities and towns all over Europe, and they are almost always Muslim. As American rocker Lee Michaels once sang out, "Can I get a witness?"

Do you know what I mean?

In The Proverbial Nutshell

The new Geert Wilders movie about Islam is about to make its appearance. The Netherlands is hunkering down waiting for the inevitable backlash. Wilders insists that his film will prove once and for all that the Koran is a fascist book, a piece of writing filthy with violence and incitements to kill until the objectives of which it espouses are met.

A few comments by a former soldier known here as Sergeant Brown:

public-flog
In America we call this police brutality, but Muslims demand sharia law...

The film will be a re-enforcement of know fact. The followers of the Qur'an provide you with a daily dose of fact by their actions. They lie, rape, murder, maim, intimidate, extort, and vandalize and scandalize, then they quote passages from the Qur'an as justification for their actions. And it is not "just a few isolated extremists who have hijacked a religion" as some will tell you. They are in almost every country constantly probing for weak people, weak security, and other weaknesses they can exploit to their benefit. They thrive on the "fear factor" of terror. They have discovered "fear works". In almost every case of terrorism by Islamic jihadists where ever it occurs you will find a mosque nearby—and in almost every case it is discovered the terrorists attended the mosque—and they quote passages from the Qur'an.

The terrorists filter in from almost every Muslim country—some come in legally (really easy to in countries with lax immigration rules), others slip in illegally (really easy to do in countries with lax border security)—and you will often see Islamic clerics giving hate speeches and threatening violence prior to an actual attack—often , just prior to the attack, the clerics will make demands for special priviledges for Muslims (you must do this—you must do that.) Or demand the host government remove its support for fighting terrorism from those who are trying to fight terrorism. The terrorists quickly warn the host country that suicide bombers and other violent acts will occur soon if their demands are not met....

In the possession of terrorists killed in attacks on innocent people you will often find:

    a) a Koran;
    b) hate documents inspired by the Koran;
    c) indications of travel and/or training in a Muslim country (often Pakistan, Iran, Syria, Yemen, or Egypt);
    d) photos of now dead marytrs who succeeded in killing infidels;
    e) newspaper clippings of violent incidents caused when some infidel dropped a Koran, improperly touched a Koran, supposedly made some perceived insulting remark about a Koran, or published an inspired cartoon depicting Muslims as they truly are (a violent people) or made a film showing how Muslims treat its women or its "followers", or of some judicial success stories when Muslims sue businesses or employers for perceived injustices (i.e. profiling, discriminating, or display of anti-Islamic sentiments)...

It becomes clearer every day that the Qur'an inspires violence—and the Muslims are proud to quote from it—and they do it often—far too often to allow it to be sold in stores, displayed in schools, or even allowed in non-Muslim countries.

You seldom see any books banned in western countries—but go to a Muslim countries and visit a bookstore and see if you can find good books about the Bible or of Biblical history. See if you can find Moby Dick, Tale of Two Cities, or any number or great classical books. See if you can find books written about the Crusades. See if you can find books about the great inventors of the world. See if you can find books about the cultures and histories of the western worlds or of its scientists or doctors...

Islam bans many books. We should ban at least one—the Qur'an—it is evil.

Thanks, Sarge. Now, YOU be the judge. If you're still not convinced, but require a more convincing audio and visual aid in fathoming this assault on your fine senses, try this clip. And please, prepare yourselves and your loved ones with the proper knowledge needed to fight this coming threat better than our leaders are preparing the nation. For what is happening in Europe, or Eurabia today, and in hotspots elsewhere around the globe, is on its way to a neighborhood near you, if things don't change at the top, and we learn to not only recognize and name our enemy, but wholeheartedly resolve to soundly defeat it.

Dismantling The Enemy

Adapted from Hugh Fitzgerald of Jihad Watch:

iraqioil
Oil Is Not The Hostage Taker

Only one thing will work. Not appeals to common sense, intelligence, morality, the truth. Not stuff like that. Hit them where it hurts. If the company that owns the billboard believes it will suffer, not necessarily through its billboard rental business, but in other ways, in other businesses it may own, and if it calculates that its losses will outweigh any "gain" from not offending Muslims and Arabs, it changes its approach. They learn that we must crush rather than appease those parties with all that oil wealth successive American governments have not done a thing to diminish. Pleading as Bush did for lower prices merely causes the cartel to believe that we believe they hold all the cards, when of course if things were understood properly, it is we who hold them, beginning with the ability to make oil just as expensive, through taxation, as we wish, and thereby diminish demand, ending with their complete reliance on the Western world for medical care, education, advanced technology, weaponry, the defense of their assorted "royal" families, and so on...

Make the owner aware that there will be consequences.

And here's another thought...

All American patriots must come to the realization that every second or third generation will have to sacrifice dearly for life and liberty, or it will be lost. The enemy we now face is no different in essence than the British Empire that we faced in 1776, or the Nazi enemy we faced in WWII. The American Revolution is not over yet, and we still must either defend ourselves from all enemies of our God-given liberty, both home and abroad; or give in to tyranny and terror. It is time to re-declare our Declaration of Independence.

Outward jihad for the installation is not a civil right. It is the brutal aggression of a sado-masochistic system which plays for keeps and is peculiarly bent on world domination.

War Theory 101

war-tricks
War Tricks

The question among Westerners with the keen sense of what's happening in the world today, "Why don't the democracies stop pandering to the Muslims and start taking corrective measures? There is little doubt that if the Western societies chose to confront Islam on Islam’s terms, the conflict would be over in a very short order."

And most of those same folks agree that this global conflagration would be over in short order, but not until the West returns to logic and begins fighting to win for the sake of its own survival as it did with Germany and Japan in WWII, and quit fighting to enforce a superficial peace mandated by the U.N, in Korea, Vietnam, Bosnia, Kuwait, Somalia...

War is actually understood and is not some mysterious creature open for daft speculation. Unless one completely destroys the aggressive population's will to continue the fight, one cannot achieve peace. And once victory is achieved, and once the vanquished is allowed to re-establish a government, one does not let them incorporate the reason for the war into their "new" constitution. In Germany and Japan, the Allies told the defeated what could and could not go into their new constitutions. This meant Naziism and Shintoism, respectively, were denied. Yet in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US has allowed these weak governments to base their constitutions on Sharia which is what caused the problem in the first place.

This flaw in war science is why the US hasn't "won" in the past 60 years.

Global Iceman Cometh

x
Project Scenewash Marks This Spot

MOSCOW—Stock up on fur coats and felt boots! This is my paradoxical advice to the warm world. The Global Iceman Cometh! Earth is now at the peak of one of its passing warm spells. It started in the 17th century when there was no industrial influence on the climate to speak of and no such thing as the hothouse effect. The current warming is evidently a natural process and utterly independent of hothouse gases.

The real reasons for climate changes are uneven solar radiation, terrestrial precession (that is, axis gyration), instability of oceanic currents, regular salinity fluctuations of the Arctic Ocean surface waters, etc. There is another, principal reason—solar activity and luminosity. The greater they are the warmer is our climate.

Astrophysics knows two solar activity cycles, of 11 and 200 years. Both are caused by changes in the radius and area of the irradiating solar surface. The latest data, obtained by Habibullah Abdusamatov, head of the Pulkovo Observatory space research laboratory, say that Earth has passed the peak of its warmer period, and a fairly cold spell will set in quite soon, by 2012. Real cold will come when solar activity reaches its minimum, by 2041, and will last for 50-60 years or even longer.

This is my point, which environmentalists hotly dispute as they cling to the hothouse theory. As we know, hothouse gases, in particular, nitrogen peroxide, warm up the atmosphere by keeping heat close to the ground. Advanced in the late 19th century by Svante A. Arrhenius, a Swedish physical chemist and Nobel Prize winner, this theory is taken for granted to this day and has not undergone any serious check.

It determines decisions and instruments of major international organizations—in particular, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Signed by 150 countries, it exemplifies the impact of scientific delusion on big politics and economics. The authors and enthusiasts of the Kyoto Protocol based their assumptions on an erroneous idea. As a result, developed countries waste huge amounts of money to fight industrial pollution of the atmosphere. What if it is a Don Quixote’s duel with the windmill?

Hothouse gases may not be to blame for global warming. At any rate, there is no scientific evidence to their guilt. The classic hothouse effect scenario is too simple to be true. As things really are, much more sophisticated processes are on in the atmosphere, especially in its dense layer. For instance, heat is not so much radiated in space as carried by air currents—an entirely different mechanism, which cannot cause global warming.

The temperature of the troposphere, the lowest and densest portion of the atmosphere, does not depend on the concentration of greenhouse gas emissions—a point proved theoretically and empirically. True, probes of Antarctic ice shield, taken with bore specimens in the vicinity of the Russian research station Vostok, show that there are close links between atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide and temperature changes. Here, however, we cannot be quite sure which is the cause and which the effect.

Temperature fluctuations always run somewhat ahead of carbon dioxide concentration changes. This means that warming is primary. The ocean is the greatest carbon dioxide depository, with concentrations 60-90 times larger than in the atmosphere. When the ocean’s surface warms up, it produces the “champagne effect.” Compare a foamy spurt out of a warm bottle with wine pouring smoothly when served properly cold.

Likewise, warm ocean water exudes greater amounts of carbonic acid, which evaporates to add to industrial pollution—a factor we cannot deny. However, man-caused pollution is negligible here. If industrial pollution with carbon dioxide keeps at its present-day 5-7 billion metric tons a year, it will not change global temperatures up to the year 2100. The change will be too small for humans to feel even if the concentration of greenhouse gas emissions doubles.

Carbon dioxide cannot be bad for the climate. On the contrary, it is food for plants, and so is beneficial to life on Earth. Bearing out this point was the Green Revolution—the phenomenal global increase in farm yields in the mid-20th century. Numerous experiments also prove a direct proportion between harvest and carbon dioxide concentration in the air.

Carbon dioxide has quite a different pernicious influence—not on the climate but on synoptic activity. It absorbs infrared radiation. When tropospheric air is warm enough for complete absorption, radiation energy passes into gas fluctuations. Gas expands and dissolves to send warm air up to the stratosphere, where it clashes with cold currents coming down. With no noticeable temperature changes, synoptic activity skyrockets to whip up cyclones and anticyclones. Hence we get hurricanes, storms, tornados and other natural disasters, whose intensity largely depends on carbon dioxide concentration. In this sense, reducing its concentration in the air will have a positive effect.

Carbon dioxide is not to blame for global climate change. Solar activity is many times more powerful than the energy produced by the whole of humankind. Man’s influence on nature is a drop in the ocean.

global_warming
Change is normal, what about you?

Earth is unlikely to ever face a temperature disaster. Of all the planets in the solar system, only Earth has an atmosphere beneficial to life. There are many factors that account for development of life on Earth: Sun is a calm star, Earth is located an optimum distance from it, it has the Moon as a massive satellite, and many others. Earth owes its friendly climate also to dynamic feedback between biotic and atmospheric evolution.

The principal among those diverse links is Earth’s reflective power, which regulates its temperature. A warm period, as the present, increases oceanic evaporation to produce a great amount of clouds, which filter solar radiation and so bring heat down. Things take the contrary turn in a cold period.

What can’t be cured must be endured. It is wise to accept the natural course of things. We have no reason to panic about allegations that ice in the Arctic Ocean is thawing rapidly and will soon vanish altogether. As it really is, scientists say the Arctic and Antarctic ice shields are growing. Physical and mathematical calculations predict a new Ice Age. It will come in 100,000 years, at the earliest, and will be much worse than the previous. Europe will be ice-bound, with glaciers reaching south of Moscow.

Meanwhile, Europeans can rest assured. The Gulf Stream will change its course only if some evil magic robs it of power to reach the north—but Mother Nature is unlikely to do that.

Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin, Merited Scientist of Russia and fellow of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, is staff researcher of the Oceanology Institute.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

Yes, the Global Iceman Cometh. Build me a snowman, Suzy Jane.

Keen Response To Earnest Palestinian

Jimmy Carter's Continuing Lust
Jimmy Carter's Continuing Lust
As always, in this battle against moral relativism, the always astute Hugh Fitzgerald from Jihad Watch separates the sticks from the stones in this reply to a self-proclaimed moderate Palestinian named Ibrahim who preaches from the old tired playbook of the eternal victim Muslims have adopted in their war of taqiyya against the West in general and against Israel in particular. Revisionism trumps the facts in their playbook. Mr. Fitzgerald's rather keen elucidation against the blurring of the facts speaks for itself. And former president Jimmy Carter simply blisters my paint.

Quite a few atheists in this particular foxhole, Ibrahim. But atheists who happen to know the history of the treatment, or mistreatment, of Jews and other non-Muslim (and non-Arab) minorities in the Middle East. Atheists who know the history of the Jews, including what happened in "Palestine" after the Muslim invasion. Atheists willing to do research into the cadastral (land ownership) records, and the demographic records, of that dusty part of the Ottoman Empire that, split between several vilayets and the separate sanjak of Jerusalem, did not have more than 100,000 people in the mid-19th century, with 15,000 in Jerusalem—a plurality of them, even then, Jews.

Atheists who know perfectly well why Lloyd George, Clemenceau, Jan Christiaan Smuts, and others who founded the League of Nations found it right, found it proper, found it just, to establish, among the various mandates (four Arab countries came out of those mandates, while the Kurds and the Armenians never had the promises made to them fulfilled, and the Jews received a dimidiated territory—only historic "Palestine" west of the Jordan —and that, of course, is precisely the territory that you know perfectly well, sir, the Arabs and Muslims have no intention of letting the Israelis permanently possess, no matter how many further territorial and other absurd concessions the Israelis, whose entire negotiating history for the past 59 years has been to give up, give up, give up, tangible gains for promises that are always and everywhere eventually breached, for those who follow the Treaty of Al Hudaibiyya (and as Majid Khadduri points out in "War and Peace in Islam" all Muslims follow Muhammad's example in that treaty, the 10-year hudna with the Meccans, broken by him after 18 months).

Yes, there are plenty of atheists, Protestants and Catholics too, and Hindus and Buddhists, and would you believe it? even Muslims of the Muslim-for-identification-purposes-only variety, and certainly every apostate I have ever met, who are deeply worried about, concerned about, and refuse to contemplate any further surrenders to the Lesser Jihad that will forever be conducted against it, the State of Israel.

Not everyone, contrary to your silly stereotype, is a holy-roller Bible-thumper who supports Israel. In fact, it only takes two things. It takes specific historical knowledge, and moral sense. And even if you lack that knowledge, and that sense, and all you know is that any further triumphs by Arab Muslims, either by pressuring Israel into still more idiotic and dangerous concessions, or by accepting the Arab narrative that attempts to disguise the Lesser Jihad as a "nationalist struggle" of that recently-invented (circa late 1967) "Palestinian people" (see Zohair Mohsen on this), will only whet, not sate, the Muslim appetite. In other words, all you have to know, now, if you are a non-Muslim, is that any concession, anywhere, to Msulim demands by any non-Muslim people or state, will be bad for all non-Muslims.

That is what many Infidels are coming to recognize. And in so doing, all the hard work of all those Arab, Muslim, and "Palestinian" propagandists over the past forty years is coming unravelled, coming undone.

Quantico Mosque Leader Promoted

HOMELAND INSECURITY
Pentagon honors Wahhabi-trained Muslim chaplain
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

decorated
decor

In a special ceremony, the Pentagon recently promoted a Wahhabi-trained Muslim chaplain who catered to al-Qaida detainees at Guantanamo and fought to establish the first mosque in Marine Corps history. Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England personally promoted Navy chaplain Abuhena Mohammed Saifulislam from lieutenant to lieutenant commander. Saifulislam also received a Joint Service Commendation Medal at the Pentagon ceremony held on the fifth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Pentagon officials say the ceremony was unprecedented. "It's unusual for a deputy secretary to personally promote an officer of that rank," said one official who wished to go unnamed. "No one has known of such a high-level dignitary doing that."

England also earlier this year personally dedicated a new Islamic center at Marine headquarters in Quantico, Va., on the advice of Saifulislam, a Bangladesh immigrant who became a U.S. citizen in 1995.

The Muslim chaplain, who is stationed at Quantico, recited verses from the Quran in Arabic and English at the summer dedication ceremony, which included representatives from the Council on American-Islamic Relations, several leaders of which have been convicted on terrorism-related charges. Saifulislam, which is Arabic for "Sword of Islam," received his religious training at a radical Islamic school raided by federal agents after 9/11. The Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences, based in Leesburg, Va., is run by Taha Jaber Al-Alwani, an unindicted co-conspirator in the Sami al-Arian terror case. A federal affidavit used to obtain a warrant to search the school alleges Al-Alwani gave at least $50,000 in jihad money "to support suicide bombings."

Saifulislam insists he is moderate and condemns "terrorism," but critics say his Wahhabi background and associations should give the Pentagon pause.

"The Pentagon is giving him a permanent, taxpayer-supported platform from which to convert grunts to Islam," said terror expert Paul Sperry, a Hoover Institution media fellow and author of "Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington." "With the Quantico mosque, the Pentagon is facilitating the study of the holy text the enemy uses, heretically or not, as their manual of warfare."

Saifulislam's promotion along with the dedication of his new Quantico mosque – the first of its kind in the 230-year history of the Corps – comes on the heels of a Muslim spy scandal at Gitmo involving another Muslim chaplain.

Army Capt. James "Yousef" Yee, who ministered to al-Qaida detainees, was charged with mishandling classified information. Yee, a convert to Islam, quit the Army and the charges were dropped. But two of his Muslim military friends at Gitmo were convicted of espionage-related crimes.

Yee's predecessor at Gitmo was Saifulislam, who was first assigned to the terrorist prison camp after 9/11. While at the Cuban base, the Navy imam privately counseled al-Qaida prisoners in their native tongues of Urdu and Arabic. "I must give hope for them to cope," Saifulislam said at the time.

He set up the diet and prayer regimes for the detainees, recommending they be served halal meals – including traditional dates and lamb – prepared according to Islamic dietary law. Gitmo detainees can now choose from a menu of 113 Muslim-appropriate meals.

In addition, Saifulislam saw to it that detainees receive copies of the Quran and have access to prayer beads and skull caps. Saifulislam also set up a program to train guards to be more sensitive to the religious customs of their Muslim prisoners.

West Point bows to Mecca

Multiculturalism appears to trump concerns about Islamist infiltration of the military. Following the Marine's lead, the Army in October dedicated a new mosque at West Point. The U.S. Military Academy's first worship hall for Muslims boasts green carpets, shoe racks and a pulpit facing Mecca. Officials agreed to set up the mosque, large enough for dozens of followers, after Muslim leaders complained that the office where Muslim cadets gathered for Friday prayers had become too crowded.

The Army has been recruiting international cadets from Muslim countries such as Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. Muslim enrollment at the academy in New York has jumped to 32 from just two in 2001.

"We live in a world where everyone is looking at the United States saying, 'You're anti-Islam,'" explained West Point Chaplain Col. John Cook. "But here at West Point, that's not what we do."

The U.S. military now boasts more than 10,000 Muslim soldiers, many of them black converts. On the eve of the Army's push into Iraq, Army Sgt. Hasan Akbar, a black Muslim convert, fragged commanding officers at a military camp in Kuwait. He killed two of them and wounded 15 others. Akbar, recently convicted of murder and given the death sentence, said at the time he did it out of loyalty to the umma, or global community of Muslims.

"You guys are coming into our countries," he said, "and you're going to rape our women and kill our children."

Within months of Akbar's traitorous 2003 attacks, the Defense Intelligence Agency issued an internal report warning that Muslim soldiers pose a possible security threat, according to national security reporter Bill Gertz in his new book "Enemies."

It was also in 2003 that Yee was accused of spying for the enemy while serving as a Muslim chaplain at Gitmo. Yee graduated from West Point, site of the Army's new mosque.